Forty-two former judges have issued an open letter defending the Election Commission of India, warning that allegations of electoral manipulation without supporting evidence could weaken public confidence in democratic institutions.The intervention comes amid opposition protests against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls.
The signatories expressed concern over what they described as repeated attempts to undermine the credibility of the Election Commission, judiciary and other constitutional bodies.They argued that political criticism remains an essential democratic right but should not involve unsubstantiated accusations against institutions responsible for protecting constitutional processes.The former judges specifically questioned allegations of vote theft, urging political parties to present credible evidence through established legal mechanisms.
42 Former Judges Back Electoral Roll Revision
Judges defending the Election Commission of India have emphasised that electoral disputes should be addressed through constitutional and legal procedures rather than allegations that could undermine public confidence. In their open letter, 42 former judges supported the Special Intensive Revision exercise, describing it as a lawful process to maintain accurate voter lists and ensure credible elections. However, opposition parties have questioned the revision process, alleging irregularities and raising concerns about the Election Commission’s independence.
The Election Commission and the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party have rejected allegations of electoral manipulation.The controversy has intensified political demonstrations and renewed public discussions about transparency, accountability and electoral safeguards.Former Supreme Court judges and retired high court judges were among those supporting the open letter.The signatories warned that weakening confidence in elections could encourage unrest and undermine democratic participation.
They also urged political parties, media organisations and citizens to exercise responsibility while discussing sensitive electoral matters.The development highlights continuing disagreements over electoral administration and the appropriate mechanisms for addressing allegations.As legal challenges and political protests continue, questions surrounding voter list accuracy, institutional independence and public confidence remain central to India’s electoral debate.
